Revenue operations: know what created the pipeline.
CRM, automation, scoring, routing and attribution, wired so that the question which activity is producing revenue has an answer that survives scrutiny.
● Start here
Tell us about the business.
It takes about a minute. It reaches the people who would do the work rather than a sales inbox, and if we are not the right fit for what you need we will say so.
Goes to hello@katama.io. No sequences, no newsletter, no list.
● What revenue operations is
Revenue operations is the connective layer between marketing, sales and the systems both use.
It covers CRM structure, lead scoring and routing, marketing automation, attribution and reporting. Its job is to make the growth engine measurable, so decisions about where to spend are made on evidence rather than on whoever argues most confidently.
Everyone reports a different number.
The symptom is familiar. Marketing reports pipeline influenced, sales reports pipeline created, finance reports something else again, and the quarterly review becomes an argument about definitions rather than a decision about spend.
Underneath it is usually the same set of causes: stages that mean different things to different reps, leads routed by a rule nobody remembers writing, campaign data that stops at the form, and a CRM that has been extended by six people over four years with no owner.
The cost is not the reporting. The cost is that you cannot tell which half of the budget is working, so you keep funding both.
This is also the least glamorous service we sell and the one most likely to change what you do next quarter.
What we fix.
We start by agreeing definitions, because no amount of tooling survives two people meaning different things by qualified.
Then the pipeline structure itself: stages with exit criteria a rep can apply consistently, scoring that reflects what actually closes, and routing that gets a lead to a human quickly.
Then attribution. Not a single model, because every model is wrong in a specific way, but a small set reported side by side with their assumptions written down.
● Included
- CRM audit and restructure
- Stage definitions and exit criteria
- Lead scoring model
- Lead routing and SLA enforcement
- Marketing automation build
- Lifecycle and nurture flows
- Campaign tracking and UTM governance
- Multi-model campaign attribution
- Funnel conversion analytics
- Executive dashboards
How the work runs.
Audit and define
What the systems currently do, what everyone believes they do, and the gap between. Definitions get written down and signed off before anything is rebuilt.
Rebuild the spine
Stages, fields, scoring and routing. Fewer fields than you have now, with owners, and required only where the data is genuinely used.
Instrument the campaigns
Tracking governance so campaign data survives the journey from click to closed won, including the self-reported question that catches what tracking cannot.
Report and maintain
Dashboards the executive team actually opens, plus the ongoing hygiene that stops the whole thing degrading again within a year.
What you get back.
The output of this work is not a metric of its own. It is the ability to trust every other number on this site.
Source of pipeline
Which campaigns, channels and accounts created opportunity, reported consistently enough to make budget decisions on.
Funnel conversion
Stage to stage conversion and time in stage, which is where you find the bottleneck that is actually costing you the quarter.
Speed to lead
How long a hand-raise waits before a human responds. Usually the cheapest thing to fix and the most expensive to ignore.
Who this suits.
- You are spending enough that misallocation is expensive
- Sales and marketing report conflicting numbers
- The CRM has grown without an owner
- Someone will own the process after we hand it over
- You have almost no data flowing yet
- Nobody will enforce the definitions once agreed
- You want a dashboard without changing the process behind it
- The real problem is pipeline volume, in which case start upstream
Fair questions.
Which CRM and automation platforms do you work in?
The mainstream ones. The work is mostly process and definition rather than platform, and a well-run HubSpot beats a badly-run enterprise stack every time. If your platform genuinely cannot do what you need we will say so, but that is rarer than vendors would like.
Will this mean a migration?
Usually not. Most of what looks like a platform problem is a definition problem wearing a platform costume. Migrations are expensive, risky and occasionally necessary, and we will argue against one until the evidence is unambiguous.
Which attribution model do you use?
Several, reported together, with their assumptions stated. First touch flatters awareness work, last touch flatters capture work, and both are wrong in predictable directions. Reporting one model as truth is how marketing teams talk themselves into defunding the thing that was working.
How long does this take?
A focused rebuild is usually six to eight weeks. The hygiene and enforcement that keeps it working is ongoing, and is the part companies skip before wondering why they are doing it again in eighteen months.