Marketing automation and revenue operations

● Start here

Tell us about the business.

It takes about a minute. It reaches the people who would do the work rather than a sales inbox, and if we are not the right fit for what you need we will say so.

Goes to hello@katama.io. No sequences, no newsletter, no list.

Name

Work email

Company

Website

What you need

What is the goal

● What revenue operations is

Revenue operations is the connective layer between marketing, sales and the systems both of them use.

It covers CRM structure, marketing automation, lead scoring and routing, attribution and reporting. Its job is to make the growth engine measurable, so decisions about where to spend are made on evidence rather than on whoever argues most confidently.

Everyone reports a different number.

Marketing reports pipeline influenced, sales reports pipeline created, finance reports something else again, and the quarterly review becomes an argument about definitions rather than a decision about spend.

Underneath it are the same few causes: stages that mean different things to different reps, leads routed by a rule nobody remembers writing, and campaign data that stops at the form.

Most CRMs have been extended by several people over several years with nobody owning the whole. Every field made sense to someone once, and together they no longer tell one story.

The real cost is not the reporting. It is that you cannot tell which half of the budget is working, so you keep funding both.

Services include.

The objective isn’t more marketing data. It’s knowing which activities are creating pipeline and revenue.

CRM optimization

Stages with clear exit criteria, fewer fields with named owners, and a structure your reps will actually keep up to date.

Marketing automation

Nurture, lifecycle and follow-up flows that run on their own, built on definitions sales and marketing have agreed.

Lead scoring

A model based on what actually closes, not on how many emails someone happened to open.

Lead routing

Every hand raised reaches the right person quickly, with response times tracked rather than assumed.

Pipeline tracking

Opportunities followed stage by stage, so you can see where deals slow down and where they stall.

Campaign attribution

Several models reported side by side with their assumptions written down, because any single model is wrong in a predictable way.

Funnel analytics

Conversion rates and time in each stage, which is where the bottleneck that is costing you the quarter usually shows up.

Executive dashboards

A small set of numbers the leadership team actually opens, built on data they can trust.

How the work runs.

Audit and define

What the systems currently do, what everyone believes they do, and the gap between the two. Definitions get written down and signed off before anything is rebuilt.

Rebuild the spine

Stages, fields, scoring and routing. Fewer fields than you have now, each with an owner, and required only where the data is genuinely used.

Instrument the campaigns

Tracking that survives the journey from first click to closed won, plus a simple question on the form that catches what tracking cannot.

Report and maintain

Dashboards the executive team actually opens, and the ongoing upkeep that stops the whole thing drifting back to where it started.

What you get back.

The output of this work is not a metric of its own. It is being able to trust every other number the business reports.

Source of pipeline

Which campaigns, channels and accounts created opportunities, reported consistently enough to make budget decisions on.

Funnel conversion

Stage to stage conversion and time in stage, which is where you find the bottleneck that is actually costing you.

Speed to lead

How long a hand raise waits before a person responds. Usually the cheapest thing to fix, and the most expensive to ignore.

Who this suits.

● A good fit if

You spend enough that putting it in the wrong place is expensive
Sales and marketing report conflicting numbers
The CRM has grown without an owner
Someone will own the process after we hand it over

Not a fit if

You have almost no data flowing yet
Nobody will enforce the definitions once they are agreed
You want a dashboard without changing the process behind it
The real problem is pipeline volume, in which case start upstream

Fair questions.

Which CRM and automation platforms do you work in?

The mainstream ones. The work is mostly process and definition rather than platform, and a well-run simple stack beats a badly run enterprise one. If your platform genuinely cannot do what you need, we will tell you, but that is rarer than it looks.

AI agents raise the stakes, because an AI agent acts on whatever the CRM fields say, so the definitions have to be agreed before one is switched on.

Will this mean a migration?

Usually not. Most of what looks like a platform problem is a definition problem. Migrations are expensive, risky and occasionally necessary, and we will argue against one until the evidence is clear.

Which attribution model do you use?

Several, reported together, with their assumptions stated. First touch flatters awareness work, last touch flatters capture work, and both are wrong in predictable directions. Reporting one model as the truth is how teams talk themselves into cutting the thing that was working. AI search needs extra care, because most of its influence never arrives as a click, so measuring AI search takes a fixed set of buyer questions and a separate AI channel in analytics, read against pipeline.

How long does this take?

It depends on how far the CRM has drifted, and the audit is what tells us. The upkeep that keeps it working is ongoing, and it is the part companies skip before finding themselves doing the rebuild again.